Bitcoin and Ethereum withdrawals at 1Win carry no platform fee at all, which puts the bookmaker in a small group of crypto-friendly operators that let players move funds out without a percentage cut. BetWinner takes the opposite approach: a flat 1% charge on every crypto withdrawal, regardless of coin or amount. MelBet sits somewhere in between, and the gap between these policies matters more as crypto betting volumes grow through 2026. The result is a straightforward trade-off between zero-fee majors and a predictable flat cut that applies across the board.<\/p>\n
1Win is licensed by Cura\u00e7ao and runs its payment stack around the idea that Bitcoin and Ethereum should move in and out without a platform surcharge. That means no percentage cut, no fixed processing fee, and no minimum charge applied by the operator itself. The only cost a player absorbs on a BTC or ETH withdrawal is the blockchain network fee, which varies with mempool congestion and is set by miners, not by 1Win. On a quiet day that can be under a dollar; during a spike it can climb into double digits for a standard transaction.<\/p>\n
Altcoins are a different story. Smaller-cap coins like Litecoin, Dogecoin, Tron, and various ERC-20 tokens carry a network fee that 1Win passes through to the player. This is not a hidden markup in the way a flat 1% would be, but it is a real cost that players comparing \u00ab\u00a0free\u00a0\u00bb withdrawals need to account for. A 1Win review that only mentions the zero-fee BTC headline misses the fact that a $50 USDT-TRC20 withdrawal can cost a couple of dollars in network charges, which is functionally similar to a 2-4% fee at that amount.<\/p>\n
The minimum withdrawal threshold at 1Win is $10, and the minimum deposit is $0.5. That low deposit floor is unusual and makes the platform accessible to players who want to test the withdrawal pipeline with a small balance before committing real money. Cryptocurrency payments are supported across the board, and the operator also handles e-wallet payments and cards for players who prefer fiat rails.<\/p>\n
A player who deposits $500 in Bitcoin, runs it through a few sportsbook markets, and withdraws $700 in Bitcoin pays nothing to 1Win. The whole $700 arrives minus the miner fee, which the network deducts regardless of which platform initiated the transaction. Compare that to BetWinner, where the same $700 withdrawal triggers a $7 deduction before the network fee is even calculated. Over a year of regular withdrawals, that 1% compounds into a meaningful drag on returns.<\/p>\n
The catch is timing. Bitcoin network fees are volatile. A withdrawal initiated on a Sunday evening during a congestion spike can cost more in miner fees than the 1% BetWinner would have charged on a mid-sized amount. Players who withdraw frequently in small increments tend to lose more to network fees than they save by avoiding a percentage cut. The zero-fee structure rewards larger, less frequent withdrawals, which is worth factoring into a withdrawal strategy.<\/p>\n
BetWinner charges a flat 1% on all crypto withdrawals. The fee applies whether the player is moving $20 in Dogecoin or $20,000 in Bitcoin. There is no tiering, no waiver for large amounts, and no distinction between major and minor coins. For a high-volume player, that 1% is a predictable cost of doing business; for a small-stakes player, it is proportionally painful. A $20 withdrawal costs $0.20 in platform fees, which sounds trivial until you realize a player doing that weekly pays over $10 a year just to access their own money.<\/p>\n
MelBet sits closer to BetWinner than to 1Win on this metric. It applies its own withdrawal fees that vary by method, and while some crypto options are cheaper than BetWinner’s flat 1%, none of the major coins are fully free in the way Bitcoin and Ethereum are at 1Win. The practical comparison across the three operators comes down to a simple question: does the player primarily use BTC and ETH, or do they spread across altcoins?<\/p>\n